Yes. It's hardwired into the DNA of fascism. The reach of the Stasi, in particular, in East Germany, is CRAAAZY to examine, now. I hope we can stigmatize it now in our culture so that the exploitation doesn't dig as deep.
I would argue that fascism is simply the true face of patriarchy - the raw, unadulterated, unfiltered evil that it has always been - and these are the inevitable consequences and conclusion to 5000 years of its domination.
I would also say that it is a very rare human being who is strong enough to withstand the kind of prolonged, agonizing torture that is dished out in isolation, over a period of days and weeks. It comes down to a primal drive for self-preservation.
And where have men been when it comes to snitching on the patriarchy? Have they not had the same lust for power and domination at the expense of their women and children -and their souls, even if it is only to be kings of their own castles?
How can we expect them not to snitch on their families and friends when they've bowing so long to the patriarchy that it has become automatic?
Solid questions. I’ve been seeing a lot of arguments lately about how individualism led us here. Maybe that’s true. Then we are more apt to ignore the collective good, therefore ratting out the neighbor is not seen as a problem.
You’re also tapping into the patriarchy, which I think leadership positions breeds in that leader ship a singular us over them mentality.
I think the shift from independence to interdependence is what we now need
I like it, except it implies a balance of power between state and citizen, which it def is not. More like CUCKerators? Lol, finding the right term is gonna take a minute, and will likely happen organically, as language tends to do.
“Under the spreading chestnut tree I sold you and you sold me: There lie they, and here lie we. Under the spreading chestnut tree.”
George Orwell, nineteen Eighty-Four
And in Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, Fireman Montag’s wife Mildred informs on Montag to the authorities.
The behavior is axiomatic in totalitarian dictatorships. fictional and non. and non.
Yes. It's hardwired into the DNA of fascism. The reach of the Stasi, in particular, in East Germany, is CRAAAZY to examine, now. I hope we can stigmatize it now in our culture so that the exploitation doesn't dig as deep.
I would argue that fascism is simply the true face of patriarchy - the raw, unadulterated, unfiltered evil that it has always been - and these are the inevitable consequences and conclusion to 5000 years of its domination.
I would also say that it is a very rare human being who is strong enough to withstand the kind of prolonged, agonizing torture that is dished out in isolation, over a period of days and weeks. It comes down to a primal drive for self-preservation.
And where have men been when it comes to snitching on the patriarchy? Have they not had the same lust for power and domination at the expense of their women and children -and their souls, even if it is only to be kings of their own castles?
How can we expect them not to snitch on their families and friends when they've bowing so long to the patriarchy that it has become automatic?
These are the questions I ponder.
Solid questions. I’ve been seeing a lot of arguments lately about how individualism led us here. Maybe that’s true. Then we are more apt to ignore the collective good, therefore ratting out the neighbor is not seen as a problem.
You’re also tapping into the patriarchy, which I think leadership positions breeds in that leader ship a singular us over them mentality.
I think the shift from independence to interdependence is what we now need
Call them what they are without any veneer: fascist collaborators.
I like it, except it implies a balance of power between state and citizen, which it def is not. More like CUCKerators? Lol, finding the right term is gonna take a minute, and will likely happen organically, as language tends to do.